Economic theory and practice are complex realms that often transcend mere numbers or technical jargon. They become profoundly more intricate when interwoven with the variegated threads of politics and power. One nation where this intriguing interaction unfolds is Türkiye, under the leadership of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Erdogan, an undeniable stalwart of Turkish politics, has long navigated the labyrinthine corridors of power with an unerring mix of populist pragmatism and strongman politics. His approach isn’t merely confined to charismatic oratory or symbolic gestures; it seeps into policy-making, shaping Türkiye’s economic direction in significant ways. Notably, Erdogan has propagated an economic philosophy rooted in Islamic financial principles, encapsulated by the credo, ‘interest is the cause, inflation is the result.’ This mantra, drawn from the Islamic concept of ‘riba,’ which views interest as economically damaging and morally questionable, has defined Türkiye’s fiscal governance during Erdogan’s tenure.
Yet, Erdogan’s economic vision extends beyond religious tenets; it also mirrors his populist pragmatism. His policies often seem designed to align with public sentiment, appeal to his political base, and secure electoral victories. As such, Erdogan’s strongman approach isn’t isolated from his pursuit of public favor but is deeply intertwined with it.
However, this unique fusion of religion, populism, and power recently met an inflection point. The Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye, under new leadership, instituted a significant shift in monetary policy, moving away from Erdogan’s low-interest doctrine. This decision to raise the policy rate markedly signals a divergence from the previous economic framework, potentially charting a new course for Türkiye’s economy.
This pivot signifies a critical juncture in Türkiye’s economic narrative, one shaped by the complex interplay of religion, populist pragmatism, and strongman politics. Such an adjustment may not only redefine Türkiye’s domestic economic trajectory but could also impact its standing on the global economic stage. However, this transformation does not come without its share of challenges and uncertainties.
Reversal in Monetary Policy: A Post-Election Narrative
The successful reelection of Erdogan appeared to trigger a decisive reevaluation of Türkiye’s economic direction. Armed with a fresh electoral mandate, Erdogan seemed both willing and driven to recalibrate the nation’s economic compass, moving away from his previous populist, low-interest-rate rhetoric that underpinned much of his earlier tenure. This dramatic policy pivot, epitomized by the Central Bank’s audacious move to inflate the policy rate by a staggering 650 basis points, encapsulates this shift towards conventional economic thinking.
Nonetheless, this return to economic orthodoxy is far from total. The looming local elections scheduled for March 2024 are a pressing reminder that populist elements cannot be entirely dispelled from the policy mix. The need to secure victory in local political races means that the Central Bank’s reorientation towards traditional economic models must still be tempered by considerations of electoral appeal.
The interplay of political pragmatism and economic rationality is evident in the diverse reactions to the policy rate hike. The immediate after-effects of the hike, characterized by widening income inequality, a dwindling share of national income for workers, and a shrinking pool of net international reserves, can stoke the fires of populist sentiment and provoke political unease. At the same time, the potential for long-term economic stability and growth associated with the policy shift makes a compelling argument for sticking with rational economic practices.
The task of steering this delicate course demands both strategic insight and political finesse. The Central Bank, together with Erdogan’s administration, is now challenged with managing the immediate backlash of their policy decisions while remaining committed to a trajectory that favors more conventional economic approaches. Striking this balance amidst the political pressure of imminent local elections only underscores the intricate balancing act inherent in marrying politics with economics.
Turning to External Investments: The New Economic Horizon
As the ripples of Türkiye’s unsettled domestic economic scene continue to reverberate, the nation’s leaders are casting their gaze outward in search of an economic lifeline. At the helm of this strategy is Mehmet Şimşek, Türkiye’s Minister of Treasury and Finance. Stepping into the shoes of economic commander, Şimşek is steering the nation toward a future that heavily leans on external investments.
In a stark contrast to the previous era, Şimşek champions an economic model anchored on principles that resonate well with the global market. His strategy hinges on upholding the freedom of enterprise, embracing a market economy, maintaining an open foreign exchange regime, implementing a floating exchange rate system, and rigorously targeting inflation. This approach contrasts sharply with the previous low-interest-rate policy, a stance that ultimately sent many Western investors packing.
While this shift in policy may herald a new dawn for Türkiye’s economic trajectory, it isn’t without its share of hurdles. The vestiges of the previous economic policies still linger, casting a long shadow over the prospects of foreign investments. But Şimşek’s vision isn’t easily clouded. He remains undeterred, his focus honed on convincing foreign investors that Türkiye is indeed a viable and profitable economic playing field.
But it is not only about changing the rules of the game. It’s about changing the game itself. The backdrop of the strongman politics of President Erdogan, combined with his populist pragmatism, forms a complicated tapestry within which Şimşek must operate. How can the Minister of Treasury and Finance craft an economic narrative that not only invites external investments but also navigates the complex political waters at home?
This is the challenge that lies before Şimşek. He must pen a persuasive story of economic potential that can woo the likes of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE to invest up to $30 billion in Türkiye’s energy, infrastructure, and defense sectors. And he must do all this while also managing the political balancing act that comes with serving under a leader like Erdogan.
Gulf Tour: A Grand Chess Move in Global Economics
The Gulf Tour, an instrumental component of Şimşek’s ambitious strategy, is akin to a high-stakes game of chess on the global economic board. Anchored by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the impending tour of the Gulf nations is more than just a diplomatic sojourn. It is a strategic maneuver aimed at luring hefty investments into Türkiye’s faltering economy.
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE – the economic powerhouses of the Middle East – are the focal points of this strategy. Erdogan, armed with a charm offensive, is set to entice these nations to funnel as much as $30 billion into Türkiye’s energy, infrastructure, and defense sectors. This is not just about investment; it’s a strategic move to mend the economic fissures that have emerged in recent years. These investments are envisioned as a panacea, a much-needed salve to restore global confidence in Türkiye’s economy.
Erdogan’s unconventional economic policies – primarily his stubborn commitment to keeping policy interest rates low – have driven many Western investors away. This created a gaping investment void, a black hole of sorts, in the Turkish economic landscape. The Gulf Tour is a calculated bid to fill this gap with funds from the Middle Eastern nations, a tactic aimed at re-establishing Türkiye as a viable and attractive investment destination.
However, this grand strategy is fraught with complications. Erdogan’s populist pragmatism, his seeming fixation on maintaining power, and his relentless quest for electoral victory, create an intricate political labyrinth that Şimşek and Erdogan must navigate. They must do so while convincing foreign investors of their commitment to economic stability and growth.
Moreover, with the local elections of March 2024 on the horizon, the economic stability that these potential investments could bring will play a key role in the political narrative. The Erdogan administration would be able to leverage this stability to fortify its position, making the success of the Gulf Tour even more critical.
We find ourselves in a critical juncture of Türkiye’s economic saga, as we observe a dramatic shift from a religiously charged, low-interest policy to a seemingly pragmatic, market-friendly approach. This strategic reversal in monetary policy, coupled with an aggressive drive for foreign investment, serves as the blueprint for what is essentially an experimental economic model for Türkiye. However, navigating this untested route resembles treading on a precarious tightrope strewn with formidable challenges and high stakes.
The road ahead is fraught with potential setbacks. The effectiveness of these novel policies hangs in the balance, teetering between the pressing need for domestic economic recalibration and the imperative of securing foreign investments. The imminent Gulf Tour, helmed by Erdogan, evolves into a high-risk gamble, the outcome of which could shape or shake Türkiye’s economic prospects. It is more than a diplomatic journey; it marks an ambitious foray into an uncertain economic landscape.
The daunting task facing President Erdogan and Finance Minister Mehmet Şimşek involves striking a balance between instigating substantial domestic reforms and fostering resilient economic alliances overseas. Their success or failure in orchestrating this multifaceted strategy will not just test their leadership abilities but also influence the trajectory of Türkiye’s economic narrative.
Yet, a daunting specter persists. The imprint of Erdogan’s strongman politics, rooted in populist pragmatism, looms ominously over these strategic shifts, casting shadows of uncertainty. The forthcoming local elections in March 2024 add another layer of complexity to this conundrum. Amid these challenges, can the administration persuasively showcase the merits of their new economic vision to a diverse audience, both domestically and internationally, and win over their confidence? The answers to these questions will unfold as Türkiye grapples with these trials and tribulations in the coming months.
All publishing rights and copyrights reserved to MENA Research and Study Center.