• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • Essays
  • Reports and Analysis
Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the GCC Have a New Transactional Dynamic

Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the GCC Have a New Transactional Dynamic

2:59 PM - 6 August, 2021
Horn of Africa: The New Battleground of Middle Eastern Powers’ Rivalries

Horn of Africa: The New Battleground of Middle Eastern Powers’ Rivalries

9:27 PM - 31 January, 2023
Erdogan’s neo-Ottoman ambitions and offensive policy in Africa

Erdogan’s neo-Ottoman ambitions and offensive policy in Africa

2:43 PM - 30 January, 2023
East Asia is calling – The Gulf Region, China and the West

East Asia is calling – The Gulf Region, China and the West

10:32 PM - 27 January, 2023
Germany will not allow Erdogan to use its soil for election propaganda

Germany will not allow Erdogan to use its soil for election propaganda

9:46 PM - 26 January, 2023
Teestunde mit Kenan Güngör, Teil 2

Teestunde mit Kenan Güngör, Teil 2

5:12 PM - 26 January, 2023
Europe Monitor No. 1 in 2023

Europe Monitor No. 2 in 2023

4:56 PM - 25 January, 2023
Islamist sects in Türkiye: Violence against children, support from Erdogan

Islamist sects in Türkiye: Violence against children, support from Erdogan

9:24 PM - 24 January, 2023
European canon of values and political Islamism

European canon of values and political Islamism

4:43 PM - 24 January, 2023
Erdogan’s Long Arm Strategy and Its Implications

Erdogan’s Long Arm Strategy and Its Implications

1:30 PM - 23 January, 2023
A guide to understanding 2023 Elections in Turkey: Losing the Elections is not an Option for Erdogan – Part 1

A guide to understanding 2023 Elections in Turkey: Losing the Elections is not an Option for Erdogan – Part 1

7:26 PM - 21 January, 2023
Erdogan’s false game

Erdogan’s false game

4:48 PM - 20 January, 2023
“Qatargate” in the European Parliament: The latest developments

“Qatargate” in the European Parliament: The latest developments

11:19 PM - 18 January, 2023
8:56 AM - 1 February, 2023
  • fr Français
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • ar العربية
  • Login
MENA Reseach and Study Center
No Result
View All Result
MENA Reseach and Study Center
No Result
View All Result
MENA Reseach and Study Center
No Result
View All Result

Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the GCC Have a New Transactional Dynamic

Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the GCC Have a New Transactional Dynamic

By Neil Quilliam, an associate fellow in the Middle East and North Africa program at Chatham House, and Sanam Vakil, the deputy director of the Middle East and North Africa program at Chatham House. This article was first published at “Foreign Policy”, July 27, 2021

After years of closely cooperating on everything from Iran to oil, the Arab Gulf is entering a moment of wariness.

The once closely coordinated and tightly knit Saudi-Emirati relationship is fraying. A cascade of policy divergences has emerged between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi over the past year, and more acutely over the past weeks. The long list of differences includes attitudes toward the war in Yemen, the pace of reconciliation with Qatar after a three-and-a-half-year rift, normalization with Israel and the Abraham Accords, managing ties with Turkey, OPEC production quotas, Iran strategy, and cross-border trade.

The emerging dynamic between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi is the new normal—and it applies not only to the two states but to all six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The sooner outside countries understand the new transactional dynamic, the better they’ll be able to manage relations with the entire region.

The once closely coordinated and tightly knit Saudi-Emirati relationship is fraying. A cascade of policy divergences has emerged between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi over the past year, and more acutely over the past weeks. The long list of differences includes attitudes toward the war in Yemen, the pace of reconciliation with Qatar after a three-and-a-half-year rift, normalization with Israel and the Abraham Accords, managing ties with Turkey, OPEC production quotas, Iran strategy, and cross-border trade.

The emerging dynamic between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi is the new normal—and it applies not only to the two states but to all six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The sooner outside countries understand the new transactional dynamic, the better they’ll be able to manage relations with the entire region.

In truth, the tensions between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi are nothing new. They were an on-again, off-again feature of GCC politics decades before the 2011 Arab uprisings. These differences were often papered over because of shared concerns stemming from Iranian regional expansion and the threat from political Islam. That these challenges are resurfacing reminds that intra-Gulf competition has long underpinned the GCC.

It’s not a coincidence that the bumpy new political dynamics coincided with a generational change in leadership, with the passing of Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah (in 2015), Oman’s Sultan Qaboos (in 2020), and Kuwait’s Sheikh Sabah (in 2020) and the emergence of younger leaders on the political scene including Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, Oman’s Sultan Haitham, and Qatar’s Emir Tamim bin Hamad. (The UAE’s Crown Prince Mohamed bin Zayed’s arrival also belongs to the new generation, though he emerged a decade earlier in 2005.)

But it was the 2011 Arab uprisings that marked a turning point in GCC relations. The domino effect of regional protests, which took hold in Bahrain, led Gulf Arab states to cooperate more closely on tackling what they perceived to be shared threats to the regional order. Sending tanks to quell protests in Bahrain in March 2011 gave a clear indication that neither Saudi Arabia nor the UAE would allow uprisings in its own neighborhood. Though badged as a GCC initiative, the move served as an early marker for closer Emirati-Saudi collaboration, which became manifest in Syria and Yemen and turned towards Qatar in 2017. But through this period, despite supporting the GCC position in Bahrain, Doha (which did not see political Islam as equally destabilizing) charted its own course that ran counter to Saudi-Emirati activism.

The rift that has come to define, and effectively end, the GCC is the blockade of Qatar, imposed in 2017 by Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Bahrain. The three states imposed 13 demands on Doha—including ending diplomatic ties with Iran, closing down Al Jazeera, and removing Turkish troops from Qatari soil—and closed their borders and cut diplomatic ties for three and a half years in an unsuccessful effort to bring Qatar to heel. The dispute was only resolved in January 2021 following Kuwaiti mediation.

During the Qatar crisis, it became fashionable to talk once again about the demise of the GCC as an institution, and its seeming replacement by the burgeoning bilateral relationship between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi. But, not long thereafter, relations between Saudi Arabia and the UAE began to reveal some strain.

Abu Dhabi’s 2020 military withdrawal from the war in Yemen and its support for local proxy groups such as the Southern Transitional Council, which is believed to have longer term secessionist ambitions, put it at odds with Riyadh, which is seeking a ceasefire and unified peacebuilding effort. And in 2019, during Tehran’s summer of escalation designed to push back against maximum pressure sanctions, Abu Dhabi tactically reversed course and began a backchannel outreach with Iran; meanwhile, Riyadh not only suffered from brazen Iran-backed attacks on its oil facilities Abqaiq and Khurais but also continued to intercept Houthis drones and missiles from Yemen, as well.

The September 2020 Abraham Accords also revealed glaring differences in the states’ strategies towards Israel. The UAE, in seeking to benefit from the commercial and strategic opportunities alongside closer cooperation with Washington, has tethered itself tightly and openly to the agreement. While Riyadh has long maintained quiet behind the scenes ties with Israel, it has taken a more cautious approach recommitting to the Palestine cause, as the only pathway to normalization. The UAE continues to tread lightly toward Ankara, while again Riyadh has charted a course of de-escalation.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia has sought to position itself as the new hub for the Gulf region in direct competition with its neighbors, demanding that international companies maintain offices in the Kingdom. Riyadh has also amended its tariff rules targeting items produced in free trade zones as well as goods manufactured in Israel. The drama over OPEC production quotas, in which Abu Dhabi took a proactive approach to increase its production baseline as a condition of extending the current deal, is yet another example of the growing competition. Lack of coordination can also be seen in the states’ varying environmental policies.

Such differences are increasingly evident throughout the GCC. Although Qatar has reconciled with Saudi Arabia and its efforts to do so with the UAE and Bahrain are advancing (albeit slowly), it will likely remain an outlier and fiercely independent, continuing to march to its own drum. Kuwait remains faithful to its Gulf Arab partners and the overall GCC project, but has been left at the altar contemplating its next moves. Meanwhile, Muscat is being wooed by and is drawing closer to Riyadh (seen through Sultan Haitham’s recent visit there); and Bahrain is getting ever nearer to Abu Dhabi.

The fundamental problem for the GCC is that the security narrative which was the glue that once stuck together the collective interests and political narratives of all six states has come undone, even though the threat from Iran remains. National interests which include economic diversification and domestic security are superseding GCC ones leading countries like the UAE and Saudi Arabia to chart their own path.

With strong familial, tribal, and commercial ties binding the GCC states and citizenries together, the edifice of coordination among the six states will no doubt continue. But the trend towards transactionalism that has taken root this year will drive the GCC states’ political, commercial, and regional policy decisions for many years to come, and affect their national political, financial, business, and energy trajectories. Most likely, each will remain committed to the concept and basic functioning of the GCC—but at the same time, they will want to go their own way.

This will not only have a significant impact on the GCC, but also on bilateral relations between member states, especially as they themselves strike up new partnerships with other regional and global players. Indeed, recent bilateral moves to strengthen ties with China, Russia, and India prove as much. The new era of relations within the GCC will also affect Washington’s ability to nurture consensus among the bloc—which is to say, there may be much less consensus than the world had recently gotten used to.

Related Posts:

  • News - The Guardian: Qatar attendance at Saudi summit raises prospect of detente
    News - The Guardian: Qatar attendance at Saudi summit raises…
  • MENA in the eye of the new EU Parliament
    MENA in the eye of the new EU Parliament
  • Back in the club: Conflict with Qatar history?
    Back in the club: Conflict with Qatar history?
Tags: Gulf StatesQatarSaudi ArabiaUAE
MENA Reseach and Study Center

2023 © by Target

MENA Research & Study Center

  • About Us
  • Regions/Areas
  • Podcast
  • Privacy Policy
  • Imprint

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Regions/Areas
  • Publications
  • Essays
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • English
    • Deutsch

2023 © by Target

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Pin It on Pinterest

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • English
  • Deutsch